Reduces restorative justice fallbacks

Crime Prevention through Restorative Justice - Evidence from Empirical Research

Evidence-Oriented Crime Prevention in Germany pp 859-886 | Cite as

  • Thomas Trenczek
  • Arthur Hartmann
Chapter
First Online:
  • 1Citations
  • 5.6k downloads

Summary

After a preceding explanation of the term, in the second section we describe the characteristic elements of the Restorative Justice Approach (RJ), which differ from traditional penalties in criminal law, without which an appropriate assessment of the crime preventive effects of RJ is not possible. In the third and fourth part, the empirical results on the practice and effectiveness of RJ programs in Germany, in particular the mediation in criminal law conflicts to enable a so-called perpetrator-victim reconciliation (TOA) are presented. This is followed by empirical findings on the special and general preventive effect of RJ procedures in Germany and internationally. The investigations do not provide any basis for fears that RJ proceedings could have an unfavorable effect on legal probation. Overall, the current state of research suggests a significantly more intensive use of mediation in criminal matters, also from a crime prevention perspective.

keywords

Restorative Justice Offender-victim reconciliation Mediation in criminal matters Conflict mediation Conflict settlement Comparative relapse investigation Effect evaluation Nationwide perpetrator-victim reconciliation statistics Victim orientation Community / community orientation
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

literature

  1. Albrecht, P. A. (Ed.). (1993). Festschrift for Horst Schüler-Springorum. For the 65th birthday. Cologne: Heymann.Google Scholar
  2. Baumann, J., Brauneck, A.-E., Burgstaller, M., Eser, A., Huber, B., Jung, H., Klug, U., Luther, H., Maihofer, M., Meier, B.-D., Rieß, P., Riklin, F., Rössner, D., Rolinski, K., Roxin, C., Schöch, H., Schüler-Springorum, H., & Weigend, T. (1992) . Alternative draft reparation (AE-WGM). Draft of a working group of German, Austrian and Swiss criminal law teachers (working group AE). Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  3. Bernd, A. F. (2017). The victim-offender balance from the victim's point of view. Theory and practice of an alternative criminal law intervention taking into account consistency theoretical assumptions. Dissertation. (Kriminalwissenschaftliche Schriften, 53). Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Bianchi, H .: (1974). The Tsedeka model as an alternative to conventional criminal law, Journal for Protestant Ethics, 18, (pp. 89-110). Google Scholar
  5. BMI / BMJ (ed.). (2006): Second periodic safety report. Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Brookes, D., & McDonough, I. (2006): The Differences between Mediation and Restorative Justice. Scottish Center for Restorative Justice. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  7. Busse, J. (2001). Relapse investigation to balance offender-victim. A statistical study in the district court of Lüneburg. Marburg, Univ., Diss. Google Scholar
  8. Cromwell, D., Blad, J., & Wright, M. (Eds.). (2013). Civilizing Criminal Justice. Hook / Hampshire (UK): Wareside Press.Google Scholar
  9. Christie, N. (1981). Limits to pain. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget / Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
  10. Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as Property. British Journal of Criminology, 1, 1 - 15. Google Scholar
  11. Crawford, A., & Goodey, J. (Eds.). (2000). Integrating a Victim Perspective within Criminal Justice. International debates. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. DBH (ed.). (2013) Restorative Justice - Trying to put the untranslatable into words; DBH materials No. 71, Cologne: self-published.Google Scholar
  13. Dolling, D. (1992). The perpetrator-victim balance. Possibilities and limits of a new form of criminal law reaction. Legal journal, 47, 493 - 499. Google Scholar
  14. Dölling, D., Hartmann, A., & Traulsen, M. (2002). Legal probation after offender-victim compensation in juvenile criminal law. Monthly for criminology and criminal law reform, 3, 185--193) Google Scholar
  15. Dölling, D., Hartmann, A., Hermann, D., & Paul, A. (2007). Legal probation after offender-victim compensation in adult criminal law. Research report by the Institute for Criminology at the University of Heidelberg on behalf of the Bavarian State Ministry of Justice. Research paper. Heidelberg University, Heidelberg. Institute for Criminology.Google Scholar
  16. Dölling, D, Duttke, G., Rössner, D., & König, S. (Eds.). (2017). Total criminal law. StGB, StPO and ancillary laws. Hand comment. 4th edition Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
  17. Domenig, C. (2012). Restorative Justice. TOA information service, No. 41, (p. 24 ff. [01-10]) and in DBH (ed.). Restorative Justice - Trying to put the untranslatable into words; DBH materials No. 71, Cologne, 8 - 23rd Google Scholar
  18. Evers, A. (2002). Case eligibility criteria from the point of view of judicial practice. TOA information service, No. 16, 36. Google Scholar
  19. Fogel, D., Galaway, B., & Hudson, J. (1972). Restitution in Criminal Justice, Criminal Law Bulletin, 8, 681 - 691. Google Scholar
  20. Frehsee, D. (1987). Damage reparation as an instrument of criminal social control. A criminal policy contribution to the search for alternative forms of sanction. Criminological and sanctions law research, Vol. 1. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  21. Götz, M., & Schäfer, C. (Eds.). (2008). Mediation in the community. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar
  22. Griffiths, C. T., & Dandurand, Y. (2006). Handbook on restorative justice programs. United Nations Criminal justice handbook series. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  23. Hagemann, O. (2007). Joint conferences in Elmshorn. In: TOA information service, No. 33, 44 - 45. Google Scholar
  24. Hagemann, O., & Lummer, R. (2012): Restorative Justice - even the untranslatable needs clear terms, TOA information service, 45, 28-35 Google Scholar
  25. Hanak, G. (1996). The community as simulation and reality. In T. Trenczek & H. Pfeiffer (eds.). Municipal crime prevention. Paradigm shift and rediscovery of ancient wisdom (Pp. 54 - 74). Bonn: Forum Verlag Godesberg.Google Scholar
  26. Hanak, G., Stehr, J., & Steinert, S. (1989). Annoyances and life disasters. About dealing with “crime” on a day-to-day basis. Bielefeld: AJZ-Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Hartmann, A. (1993). Finishing or straightening. The perpetrator-victim compensation and the (youth) criminal law (See also: Munich, Univ., Diss., 1993). Munich: Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
  28. Hartmann, A., & Trenczek, T. (2016). Mediation in conflicts relevant to criminal law - professional standards taking into account the Mediation Act and the EU Victim Protection Directive. New justice, 8, 325--333. Google Scholar
  29. Hartmann, A., Haas, M., Eikens, A., Steengrafe, F., & Steudel, T. (2012). TOA in Prison - Between Claims and Reality. Results of the MEREPS project. TOA information service No. 44, 26-33. Google Scholar
  30. Hartmann, A., Haas, M., Eikens, A., & Kerner, H.-J. (2014). Offender-victim reconciliation in Germany. Evaluation of the nationwide perpetrator-victim compensation statistics for the years 2011 and 2012. Row right. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.Google Scholar
  31. Hartmann, A., Schmidt, M., Ede, K., & Kerner, H.-J. (2016): Offender-victim reconciliation in Germany. Evaluation of the nationwide perpetrator-victim-compensation statistics for the years 2013 and 2014: Report for the Federal Ministry of Justice and Consumer Protection. Row right. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg.Google Scholar
  32. Jacob, B.R. (1970). Reparation or restitution by the criminal offender to his victim: Applicability of an ancient concept in the modern correctional process. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 2, 152-167. Google Scholar
  33. Jakobs, G. (1991). Criminal law, general part. The basics and attribution theory. Textbook. 2nd edition Berlin / New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Jellinek, G. (1878). The socio-ethical meaning of right, wrong and punishment. Berlin: Alfred Hölder, K. K. Court and University Booksellers.Google Scholar
  35. Johnstone, G., & van Ness, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of Restorative Justice. Cullompton / UK: Willan.Google Scholar
  36. Katende, J. (1967). Why were punishments in pre-European East Africa mainly compensative rather than punitive? Dar Es Salaam Law Journal, 2, 122. Google Scholar
  37. Kempfer, J., & Rössner, D. (2008). Crime Prevention by TOA: Results from Relapse Research. TOA information service No. 36, pp. 5-10. Google Scholar
  38. Kerner, H.-J. (1985). The re-establishment of the victim as the subject of criminal law. In H. Jannsen & H.-J. Kerner (ed.) Crime Victims, Social Work, and Justice (Pp. 495-21). Bonn: DBH.Google Scholar
  39. Kerner, H.-J., Eikens, A., & Hartmann, A. (2011). Offender-victim reconciliation in Germany. Evaluation of the nationwide perpetrator-victim-compensation statistics for the years 2006 to 2009, with a review of the development since 1993; Report for the Federal Ministry of Justice. Row right. Mönchengladbach: Forum-Verlag Godesberg.Google Scholar
  40. Kerner, H.-J., & Weitekamp, ​​E. (2013). Practice of perpetrator-victim reconciliation in Germany - results of a survey on institutions and mediators. Berlin: Federal Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  41. Klinger, E., & Bierbrauer, G. (2006). Procedural Justice - Key to Successful Conflict Management. Conflict Management Magazine 36-38 and 71-74) Google Scholar
  42. Kreissl, R. (1987). The simulation of social order, Criminological Journal, 19, 269-302. Google Scholar
  43. Kuhn, T. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  44. Laster, R. (1970). Criminal restitution. A survey of its past history and an analysis of its present usefulness. University of Richmond Law Review, 1, 71-98. Google Scholar
  45. Matt, E. (2002). Responsibility and (wrong) behavior. For restorative justice. Münster: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. McCold, P. (1996). Restorative justice and the role of the community. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.). Restorative Justice. International Perspectives (Pp. 85-101). Monsey N.Y .: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  47. McCold, P., & Wachtel, T. (1998). Community is not a place. A new look at Community Justice Initiatives, Contempory Justice Review, 1, 71-85. Google Scholar
  48. Miers, D., & Willemsens, J. (Eds.). (2004). Mapping Restorative Justice: Developments in 25 European Countries. Leuven: European Forum for Victim-Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice.Google Scholar
  49. Montada, L. (1999). Justice as an Object of Political Psychology. Journal of Political Psychology, 7, 3-22. Google Scholar
  50. Nader, L. (1975). Forums for justice: A cross-cultural perspective; Journal of Social Issues, 31, 151 - 170. Google Scholar
  51. Netzig, L., & Trenczek, T. (1996). Restorative justice as participation: theory, law, experience and research. In B. Galaway & J. Hudson (Eds.), Restorative justice: international perspectives (Pp. 241-260). Monsey NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pelikan, C. (2013). Restorative Justice - (m) a way TOA information service 43/2012, 21 as well as in DBH (Ed.): Restorative Justice - The attempt to put the untranslatable into words; DBH materials No. 71, Cologne, 38 - 52. Google Scholar
  53. Pelikan, C., & Trenczek, T. (2006). Victim Offender Mediation and Restorative Justice - the European landscape. In D. Sullivan & L. Tifft (Eds.), Handbook of Restorative Justice: A Global Perspective (Pp. 63 - 90). London (UK): Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Pfeiffer, C. (1991). Our juvenile criminal law - a punishment for young people? DVJJ Journal, 2, 114 - 129. Google Scholar
  55. Pfeiffer, C. (1993). Victim Perspectives. Reparation and punishment from the people's point of view. In P.-A. Albrecht (ed.), Festschrift for Horst Schüler-Springorum. For the 65th birthday (Pp. 53 - 80). Cologne: Heymann.Google Scholar
  56. Pfohl, S. (1981). Labeling criminals. In H. L. Ross (Ed.), Law and Deviance (Pp. 65 - 97). Beverly Hills, Cal .: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Pranis, K., Stuart, B., & Wedge, M. (2003). Peacemaking Circles. From crime to community. St. Paul: Living Justice Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rawls, J. (1958). Justice as Fairness, The Philosophical Review, 2, 164 - 194. Google Scholar
  59. Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Schöch, H. (Ed.). (1987). Reparation and Criminal Justice. Munich: FinkGoogle Scholar
  61. Sessar, K. (1992). Reparations or punishments. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus.Google Scholar
  62. Sessar, K. (1989). Need for punishment and conflict settlement. For the acceptance of reparation in and instead of criminal law. In E. Marks (Ed.), Offenders victim Compensation. From the interpersonal path to the restoration of legal peace (Pp. 42 - 56). Bonn: Forum-Verlag Godesberg.Google Scholar
  63. Sessar, K., Beurskens, A., & Boers, K. (1986). Reparation as a conflict resolution paradigm. Criminological Journal, 18, 86-104.Google Scholar
  64. Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice. The evidence. London: The Smith Institute.Google Scholar
  65. Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Mayo-Wilson, E., Woods, D., & Ariel, B. (2015): Are Restorative Justice Conferences Effective in Reducing Repeat Offending? Findings from a Campbell Systematic Review. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31 (1), 1 - 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9222-9.
  66. Shonholtz, R. (1984). Neighborhood Justice Systems, Work, Structure, and Guiding Principles. Mediation Quarterly, 5, 3--30. Google Scholar
  67. Splinter, D. (2005). Community mediation - project landscape and state of the art. Spectrum mediation, 19, 14-17 Google Scholar
  68. Strang, H., & Sherman, L. W. (2015). The morality of evidence: the second annual lecture for Restorative Justice: An International Journal. Restorative Justice: An International Journal, 1, 1-32. Google Scholar
  69. Temme, G. (2008). Restorative Justice - a counter model in the sense of absolutism; Criminological Journal, 40, 83-96. Google Scholar
  70. Trenczek, T. (1993). Subsidiarity of juvenile criminal law - program or empty formula? Proposals for a substantive new conception of social control under youth criminal law. Legal Policy Journal, 5, 184-189) Google Scholar
  71. Trenczek, T. (2002). Victim-offender-reconciliation: The danger of cooptation and a useful reconsideration of law theory, Contemporary Justice Review, 5, 23-34 Google Scholar
  72. Trenczek, T. (2003). Mediation in criminal law, Journal for Conflict Management, 104. Google Scholar
  73. Trenczek, T. (2005). Dispute settlement in civil society - Beyond the war of the roses and chain link fence; Journal of Legal Sociology, Vol. 26, 3 - 23 Google Scholar
  74. Trenczek, T. (2013a). Beyond Restorative Justice to Restorative Practice. In D. Cromwell, J. Blad & M. Wright (Eds.), Civilizing Criminal Justice: An International Restorative Agenda for Penal Reform (Pp. 409-428). Hook / Hampshire (UK): Waterside Press.Google Scholar
  75. Trenczek, T. (2013b). Restorative Justice in New Zealand. New criminal policy, 3, 268-287. Google Scholar
  76. Trenczek, T. (2014). Restorative Justice, TOA and Mediation - Basics, Practical Problems and Perspectives. In D. Baier & T. Mößle (eds.), Criminology is social science. Festschrift for Christian Pfeiffer (Pp. 605-623). Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  77. Trenczek, T. (2015). Restorative justice: new paradigm, sensitizing theory or even practice? Restorative Justice: an International Journal; special book review forum - A tribute to Howard Zehr. Routledge 2015, 3, 453--459.Google Scholar
  78. Trenczek, T. (2016). Mediation and offender-victim reconciliation. Characteristics and professional standards. Journal for Conflict Management, 4 - 8 Google Scholar
  79. Trenczek, T. (2017). Community mediation. In Trenczek, T., Berning, D., Lenz, C., & Will, H.-D. (Ed.), Mediation and conflict management (Pp. 577-582). Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2nd edition, chap. 5.13 Google Scholar
  80. Trenczek, T., & Goldberg, B. (2016). Juvenile delinquency, youth welfare and criminal justice. Stuttgart: BoorbergGoogle Scholar
  81. Trenczek, T., Berning, D., Lenz, C., & Will, H.-D. (Ed.). (2017). Mediation and conflict management. Baden-Baden: Nomos 2nd edition Google Scholar
  82. Trenczek, T., Tammen, B., Behlert, W., & Boetticher, A. v. (2018). Basic Law. Cape. I-1.2 5th 5th edition, Munich: UTB / Reinhardt.Google Scholar
  83. Waage Hannover e. V. (ed.). (2006). Civic engagement in the context of social space-related mediation - model project of Waage Hannover e. V. Hanover: Libra Hanover.Google Scholar
  84. Walgrave, L. (2002). Restorative Justice and the Law. Portland (USA): Willan PublishingGoogle Scholar
  85. Walzer, M. (1994). Spheres of justice. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
  86. Wandrey, M., & Weitekamp, ​​E. (1998). The organizational implementation of the perpetrator-victim compensation in the Federal Republic of Germany - a preliminary assessment of the development in the period from 1989 to 1995. In: Federal Ministry of Justice (Ed.), Offender-victim reconciliation in Germany. Inventory and perspectives (Pp. 121 - 48). Bonn.Google Scholar
  87. Weigend, T. (1989). Victims of crime and criminal proceedings. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
  88. Wright, M. (1977). Nobody came: criminal justice and the need of victims, Howard Journal 16, 22-31 Google Scholar
  89. Zehr, H. (1985). Retributive Justice - Restorative Justice. Elkart: Mennonite Central Committee.Google Scholar
  90. Zehr, H. (2002). Changing Lenses. A new focus on Crime and Justice. Scottdale (USA): Harald Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1. Hannover, Germany
  2. 2.BremenGermany